There has been a noticeable trend among
church businesses. The removal of the cross from their buildings and
in some cases within their alters and/or their inner chambers of
worship. It has become the decision of the pastors or leaders to
remove the cross because it offends the “unchurched”; it makes
them feel uncomfortable to attend a place that has a religious
atmosphere. The leaders of these religious businesses feel it is more
important to make these “unchurched” attendees more
comfortable with the removal of the cross, and allow to win them
over.
|
Lakewood Church, the preaching grounds of Joel Osteen, does not have a cross on the building or inside . | | |
Win them over to what?
And now, little children, abide in
Him, that when He appears, we may have confidence and not be ashamed
before Him at His coming. (1 John 2:28, NKJV)
For whoever is ashamed
of Me and My words, of him the Son of Man will be ashamed
when He comes in His own glory, and in His Father’s, and of the
holy angels. (Luke 9:26, NKJV)
The religious businesses removal of the
cross, the symbol of our Faith, are telling us (paraphrasing), “It
is more important not to offend the sinner in lieu of the cross and
what Jesus did for us on Calvary.” The leaders of these church
businesses are concerned about appearances from the masses of the
“unchurched.” They are bowing down to political correctness or
the opinions of others outside of the Faith. And to what end?
What is the real reason for denying the
display of the cross?
It comes down to money and power. The
more attendees and members, the more wallets and contributors to the
tithe doctrine. And the more power the church business can have
within the community. This is the operation of North Point Community
Church in Alpharetta, GA. They don't display the cross on their
church business building, logo, or within the confines thereof. By
adapting the cross-removal policy, they can now attract more and more
people unfamiliar with the real teachings of Jesus. The members are
deceived by omission, and are then lead into further deceptions,
rock-n-roll so-called worship music, and fed humanism such as how to
be successful, how to manage your money, how to have a successful
marriage and so forth. They have even gone so far as to introduce
yoga (Hinduism) to the mindless youth.
Their precious leader of whom they
often refer to as a wonderful preacher and omit the preeminence of
Christ in the same boastful comments, lives in a multimillion dollar
home in a gated community, drives expensive cars and has a lifestyle
of the rich and famous. Joel Osteen lives in a $10.1 million mansion
Andy Stanley will have a lot to answer
to on the glorious day of Christ's coming.
In essence, the church businesses
removal of the cross is not so much about the winning of souls, but
it's primary goal is money and power. The realization of Christ is
dismissed in favor of false teachings, man’s doctrines and
regulations, humanism, and false hope.
By the way, North Point Community
Church, by which I often refer to as “North Pointless” is the
second largest church business in the United States and still growing
in membership.
In a manner of speaking there does not
seem to be much difference to the way these church businesses appear
in comparison to a country club; they are worldly and members
maintain the attitude of conforming to the ways of the world,
including rock-n-roll music, pride, and other fleshly desires. There
is no true representation of Christ within their souls. Many fall
under the description of those pleading to Christ as in Matthew
7:21-23, another inconvenient truth that many church businesses
refuse to teach.
When He had called the people to
Himself, with His disciples also, He said to them, “Whoever desires
to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and
follow Me. For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but
whoever loses his life for My sake and the gospel’s will save it.
For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses
his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? For
whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful
generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when He comes
in the glory of His Father with the holy angels. (Mark 8:34-38,
NKJV)
The pleading may follow:
Lord, Lord, have we not sang wonderful
rock-n-roll songs in your name? And, Jesus, we didn't want to offend
the 'unchurched' and have them not know you, so we removed the cross
from our building so they would feel more at ease.
And based upon Matthew 7:21-24, we know
what Jesus is going to say and do to the cross-removers... they will
be sent to a place where there will weeping and gnashing of teeth.
It comes down to this: If you are
truly a follower of Jesus Christ, then you would not be ashamed of
Him in any form or capacity, including but not limited of the Cross.
The Holy Spirit gives us, the True Member of Ekklesia, boldness to
speak of Him and Him alone. We know to have nothing to do with
the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them (refer to
Ephesians 5:11).
We are living in a time where disciples
of Jesus are being ever increasingly persecuted. The U.S. Government
will not allow the display of the Ten Commandments in public areas,
pray in public or in government schools, display the name of Jesus in
public, allow the Bible to be in government Courtrooms, and /or state
that Jesus is Lord in public because it might offend atheist,
Muslims, Buddhist, or some other religious sect/cult.
Are we to subscribe and bow down to
“political correctness?” Have we become wimps, afraid to show
the power who lives in us while in public areas, restaurants, and/or
any location? Are we to be pushed around by the government who
dictate to what the members of Ekklesia are to say, do and display?
I know that we, as members of the real
Church, Ekklesia, will be held accountable as to our lack of boldness
or being ashamed of Him in any form or capacity.
Regardless of the false pastors' claims
about the removal of the cross, the “unchurched” say about being
offended, and the unbelievers' desire to ridicule His disciples...
And if it seems evil to you to serve
the Lord, choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether
the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the
River, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you dwell. But
as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
(Joshua 24:15, NKJV)
What is your decision? Bold, ashamed,
or don't even care?
---------------------------- Ground Zero Cross --------------------------------------------
Ground Zero Cross:
Court presses atheist group to explain why artifact is 'offensive'
A federal appeals court said this week that an atheist group trying
to keep the so-called Ground Zero Cross out of the National September 11
Memorial Museum must better explain how displaying the artifact is
“offensive” and violates members’ constitutional rights.
The 17-foot-tall, steel beam “cross” was found in the rubble of the
World Trade Center twin towers in New York that fell during the Sept. 11
terror attacks.
The cross became a sort of shrine or place of comfort for first
responders who often prayed there and left messages or flowers. It was
moved away from the debris a few weeks later and became a tourist
attraction through several years of reconstruction.
American Atheists filed the suit in 2011, which was thrown out last
year by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York.
The appeals court ruling Thursday cites an amicus brief filed by the
Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit law firm that specializes
in church-state law and protecting the free expression of all religious
traditions.
“We’re thrilled that the court picked up on this issue,” said group
lawyer Eric Baxter, whose brief argued that American Atheists had no
right to bring a lawsuit in the first place. “Courts should not allow
people to sue just because they claim to get ‘dyspepsia’ over a
historical artifact displayed in a museum.”
The museum officially opened on May 21.
The judge has now given the plaintiffs until July 14 to file
supplemental legal briefs before deciding whether the case will proceed.
Among the questions that must be answered in the new filings is how the
offensiveness of the cross, which the plaintiffs view as a Christian
symbol for all 9-11 victims, becomes a “constitutional injury.”
The other question is -- if the plaintiffs indeed feel displaying the
cross “marginalizes them as American citizens” -- then how is that a
“particular and concrete injury" compared to just “the abstract
stigmatization of atheists generally.”
The judge has also asked the plaintiffs to substantiate their claim
the museum and Sept. 11 memorial are getting taxpayer dollars.
“Taking personal offense is not an injury that warrants invoking the
power of the courts to shut down everything you disagree with,” Baxter
also said. “The Constitution is not a personal tool for censoring
everyone’s beliefs but your own.”